The nineteen members of Congress are planning to boycott President-elect Trump’s inauguration on January 20. Reps. Lewis, Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., Barbara Lee, D-Calif., Katherine Clark, D-Mass., are some of congressmet who will boycott inauguration. Georgia representative and civil-rights leader John Lewis announced last week that he will boycott President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20.
“I don’t see this president-elect as a legitimate president,”. “You cannot be at home with something that you feel that is wrong, is not right.” Since Lewis announced his boycott of the inauguration, and Trump subsequently denounced Lewis as “all talk, talk, talk — no action or results,” the ranks of Democratic representatives staying home rather than witnessing the peaceful transition of power have swelled to over two dozen.
Newspapers continue to cite the boycott as an unprecedented act. For example, the Sacramento Bee claimed that the boycott was “breaking with generations of past precedent.” And Business Insider erroneously reported that the 2017 inauguration will be “the first time he [Lewis] will miss an inauguration since 1986,” the year he was elected to Congress.
But this isn’t the first time Lewis and Lee, has boycotted a presidential inauguration. According to a Washington Post article written on January 21, 2001 Lewis and other members of the Black Caucus boycotted George W. Bush’s inauguration because they didn’t “believe Bush is the true elected president.” Lewis spent the day in his Atlanta district.
Maybe they had a better excuse that time, as there was so much lingering acrimony surrounding the Florida recount.
But we’re talking about elected members of Congress who have refused to accept two Republican presidencies in a row
Is there always a good enough excuse whenever a Republican wins? At what point is it fair to ask whether some people are just not committed to democratic or legal processes at all unless the results come out as they hope?